Utility of the JAX Clinical Knowledgebase in capture and assessment of complex genomic cancer data.

Cancer genomic data is continually growing in complexity, necessitating improved methods for data capture and analysis. Tumors often contain multiple therapeutically relevant alterations, and co-occurring alterations may have a different influence on therapeutic response compared to if those alterations were present alone. One clinically important example of this is the existence of a resistance conferring alteration in combination with a therapeutic sensitizing mutation. The JAX Clinical Knowledgebase (JAX-CKB) (https://ckb.jax.org/) has incorporated the concept of the complex molecular profile, which enables association of therapeutic efficacy data with multiple genomic alterations simultaneously. This provides a mechanism for rapid and accurate assessment of complex cancer-related data, potentially aiding in streamlined clinical decision making. Using the JAX-CKB, we demonstrate the utility of associating data with complex profiles comprising ALK fusions with another variant, which have differing impacts on sensitivity to various ALK inhibitors depending on context.

Barriers preventing the adoption of comprehensive cancer genomic profiling in the clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive cancer genomic profiling provides the opportunity to expose the various molecular aberrations potentially driving tumor progression. Consequently, the identity of these genetic drivers can be utilized to match a patient to the most appropriate targeted therapy, thereby increasing the probability of improved clinical outcome. Despite its capability of informing patient care, the adoption of comprehensive cancer genomic profiling in the clinic has not been widespread. The barriers surrounding its universal acceptance are attributed to both physician and patient perspectives. Areas covered: The following report discusses the various obstacles in place, including those related to clinical utility, education, insurance coverage, and clinical trials, which can deter physicians and patients from utilizing genomic profiling for therapeutic decision-making. Expert commentary: The authors review the recent growth and potential of clinical utility studies over the last two years, provide a suggestive framework for educational support, and comment on the use of social media to enhance clinical trial recruitment.

mTOR Inhibitors in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The progression of prostate cancer to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is often a result of somatic alterations in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway, suggesting that therapies targeting this pathway might lead to improved survival and efficacy. Here, we systematically evaluate the results of clinical trials investigating mTOR inhibition in CRPC and utilize preclinical data to predict clinical outcomes. METHODS: Trials included in the study were identified through PubMed and via review of conference abstracts cited by relevant review articles. The eligibility of trials was independent of sample size, clinical setting, or date. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies were eligible for qualitative analysis. The clinical setting was variable among studies, and all utilized an allosteric mTOR inhibitor as either a monotherapy or in combination. Molecular criteria were evaluated in three trials. Among most studies, the prostate-specific antigen level declined during treatment, but often increased shortly thereafter. Partial responses to treatment were minimal, and no complete responses were reported. Two studies exploring therapy with an mTOR inhibitor in combination with bicalutamide resulted in minimal efficacy. Overall, allosteric mTOR inhibition was deemed to be inadequate for the treatment of CRPC. CONCLUSION: Preclinical data suggest that a reciprocal feedback mechanism between PI3K and androgen receptor signaling is a potential mechanism behind the clinical inefficacy of mTOR inhibitors in CRPC, indicating combinatorial targeting of PI3K, mTORC1/2, and the androgen receptor might be more effective. Comprehensive analysis of preclinical data to assess clinical trial targets and efficacy may reduce the number of unproductive trials and identify potentially beneficial combinatorial therapies for resistant disease.

The clinical trial landscape in oncology and connectivity of somatic mutational profiles to targeted therapies.

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine in oncology relies on rapid associations between patient-specific variations and targeted therapeutic efficacy. Due to the advancement of genomic analysis, a vast literature characterizing cancer-associated molecular aberrations and relative therapeutic relevance has been published. However, data are not uniformly reported or readily available, and accessing relevant information in a clinically acceptable time-frame is a daunting proposition, hampering connections between patients and appropriate therapeutic options. One important therapeutic avenue for oncology patients is through clinical trials. Accordingly, a global view into the availability of targeted clinical trials would provide insight into strengths and weaknesses and potentially enable research focus. However, data regarding the landscape of clinical trials in oncology is not readily available, and as a result, a comprehensive understanding of clinical trial availability is difficult. RESULTS: To support clinical decision-making, we have developed a data loader and mapper that connects sequence information from oncology patients to data stored in an in-house database, the JAX Clinical Knowledgebase (JAX-CKB), which can be queried readily to access comprehensive data for clinical reporting via customized reporting queries. JAX-CKB functions as a repository to house expertly curated clinically relevant data surrounding our 358-gene panel, the JAX Cancer Treatment Profile (JAX CTP), and supports annotation of functional significance of molecular variants. Through queries of data housed in JAX-CKB, we have analyzed the landscape of clinical trials relevant to our 358-gene targeted sequencing panel to evaluate strengths and weaknesses in current molecular targeting in oncology. Through this analysis, we have identified patient indications, molecular aberrations, and targeted therapy classes that have strong or weak representation in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we describe the development and disseminate system methods for associating patient genomic sequence data with clinically relevant information, facilitating interpretation and providing a mechanism for informing therapeutic decision-making. Additionally, through customized queries, we have the capability to rapidly analyze the landscape of targeted therapies in clinical trials, enabling a unique view into current therapeutic availability in oncology.

Clinical Trials in Precision Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Availability of genomic information used in the management of cancer treatment has outpaced both regulatory and reimbursement efforts. Many types of clinical trials are underway to validate the utility of emerging genome-based biomarkers for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive applications. Clinical trials are a key source of evidence required for US Food and Drug Administration approval of therapies and companion diagnostics and for establishing the acceptance criteria for reimbursement. CONTENT: Determining the eligibility of patients for molecular-based clinical trials and the interpretation of data emerging from clinical trials is significantly hampered by 2 primary factors: the lack of specific reporting standards for biomarkers in clinical trials and the lack of adherence to official gene and variant naming standards. Clinical trial registries need specifics on the mutation required for enrollment as opposed to allowing a generic mutation entry such as, "EGFR mutation." The use of clinical trials data in bioinformatics analysis and reporting is also gated by the lack of robust, state of the art programmatic access support. An initiative is needed to develop community standards for clinical trial descriptions and outcome reporting that are modeled after similar efforts in the genomics research community. SUMMARY: Systematic implementation of reporting standards is needed to insure consistency and specificity of biomarker data, which will in turn enable better comparison and assessment of clinical trial outcomes across multiple studies. Reporting standards will facilitate improved identification of relevant clinical trials, aggregation and comparison of information across independent trials, and programmatic access to clinical trials databases.

CPR skill retention of first aid attendants within the workplace.

INTRODUCTION: Immediate resuscitation is necessary in order to achieve conscious survival for persons who have lost airways or pulses. However, current literature suggests that even in medically-trained personnel, CPR skills are forgotten shortly after certification. HYPOTHESIS/PROBLEM: The purpose of this study was to determine the CPR skill and knowledge decay in those who are paid to respond to emergency situations within the workplace. METHODS: Using an unconscious victim scenario, the sequence and accuracy of CPR events were observed and recorded in 244 participants paid to act as first responders in large industrial or service industry settings. RESULTS: A significant negative correlation was observed between days since training and a pre-CPR safety check variable, periodic checks for breathing and positioning. Many of the knowledge-related assessment skills (e.g., scene safety, emergency medical system (EMS) activation) appeared to deteriorate with time, although they could be contaminated by the repetition of training in those who had recertified one or more times. Skill-based components such as landmarking for chest compressions and controlling the airway declined in a more predictable fashion. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that repetition may be more important than days since last trained for skill and knowledge retention, and methods of "refreshing" skills should be examined. While skills deteriorate rapidly, changing frequency of certification is not necessarily the best way to increase retention of skill and knowledge.